×
Search
×
×
< Return to Form
×
Skip to content
Donate
Search
About
Blog
Press
Contact
Search
Get Updates
Donate
Get Updates
Donate
Election Protection
Featured Election Protection Case
Challenging Voter Suppression
Challenging Intimidation of Voters
Challenging Unsafe and Unequal Voting Practices
Challenging Insecure Voting Systems
Money In Politics
Challenging Foreign Influence in Elections
Defending State Campaign Finance Reform Laws
Advancing New Scholarship
Challenging Super PACs
The Free and Fair Elections Amendment
Corporate Abuse of Power
Challenging Corruption
The 14point3 Campaign
Current Legal Actions to Challenge Corruption
Challenging Corruption Overview
The Democracy Amendments
Blog
Press
About Us
Support Us
Contact Free Speech For People
Our Issues
Election Protection
Featured Election Protection Case
Challenging Voter Suppression
Challenging Intimidation of Voters
Challenging Unsafe and Unequal Voting Practices
Challenging Insecure Voting Systems
Money In Politics
Challenging Foreign Influence in Elections
Defending State Campaign Finance Reform Laws
Advancing New Scholarship
Challenging Super PACs
The Free and Fair Elections Amendment
Corporate Abuse of Power
Challenging Corruption
The 14point3 Campaign
Current Legal Actions to Challenge Corruption
Challenging Corruption Overview
The Democracy Amendments
Take Action
Citizens United, Part 2? Supreme Court Overturns MT Law Banning Corporate Elections Spending
Latest Developments
Google Does Not Have Blanket Immunity Under Section 230, Legal Advocates Argue in Friend of the Court Brief before the Supreme Court
Posted on
December 6, 2022
Corporate Abuse of Power
Free Speech For People today filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court in support of the petitioners in the case of Gonzalez v. Google. Our brief shows the ways in which Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act has been wrongly interpreted by the courts to provide blanket immunity to online
Read More
Free Speech For People Statement on Attorney General Garland’s Appointment of a Special Counsel
Posted on
November 28, 2022
(December 7, 2022)
Challenging Corruption
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of a special counsel to take over investigations of Donald Trump’s interference with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election and his subsequent theft of national security documents is another misguided gesture to appease Trump apologists who will accuse Garland of engaging in a political persecution no
Read More
FSFP President John Bonifaz Discusses on The BradCast the Campaign to Bar Trump and Other Insurrectionists from the Ballot and AG Garland’s Appointment of a Special Counsel To Investigate The Former President.
Posted on
November 22, 2022
(December 7, 2022)
Challenging Corruption
FSFP President John Bonifaz recently appeared on The BradCast to discuss TrumpIsDisqualified.org, a national grassroots campaign to urge Secretaries of State and other chief elections officials to bar former President Donald Trump from appearing on any future ballot based on his incitement of the Jan 6 insurrection. Bonifaz also discussed the implications of Attorney General
Read More
Posted on
May 21, 2014
(November 4, 2019)
Share:
Post navigation
The Other Scandal
Ask Bill Moyers: How can ordinary people help to overturn or nullify the Citizen United Decision?