×
Search
×
×
< Return to Form
×
Skip to content
Donate
Search
More Ways to Give
About
Blog
Press
Contact
Search
Get Updates
Donate
More Ways to Give
Get Updates
Donate
More Ways to Give
About Us
Election Protection
Featured Election Protection Case
Challenging Voter Suppression
Challenging Intimidation of Voters
Challenging Unsafe and Unequal Voting Practices
Challenging Insecure Voting Systems
Money In Politics
Challenging Foreign Influence in Elections
Defending State Campaign Finance Reform Laws
Advancing New Scholarship
Challenging Super PACs
The Free and Fair Elections Amendment
Corporate Abuse of Power
Challenging Corruption
SCOTUS Reform Now
The 14point3 Campaign
Current Legal Actions to Challenge Corruption
Challenging Corruption Overview
The Democracy Amendments
Blog
Press
Support Us
Contact Free Speech For People
Our Issues
Election Protection
Featured Election Protection Case
Challenging Voter Suppression
Challenging Intimidation of Voters
Challenging Unsafe and Unequal Voting Practices
Challenging Insecure Voting Systems
Money In Politics
Challenging Foreign Influence in Elections
Defending State Campaign Finance Reform Laws
Advancing New Scholarship
Challenging Super PACs
The Free and Fair Elections Amendment
Corporate Abuse of Power
The Big Tech Accountability Act
Challenging Unchecked Corporate Power
Challenging Corruption
SCOTUS Reform Now
The 14point3 Campaign
Current Legal Actions to Challenge Corruption
Challenging Corruption Overview
The Democracy Amendments
Take Action
The Other Scandal
Latest Developments
The Supreme Court’s Self-Serving Decisions to Exonerate Corrupt Officials For the Court’s Own Benefit
Posted on
November 1, 2024
Supreme Court
The following is commentary by Amira Mattar, Counsel, and Courtney Hostetler, Legal Director, at Free Speech For People. It originally appeared as an op-ed in Common Dreams and is reprinted below: Opinion by opinion, the Supreme Court has moved towards a judicial framework that insulates justices from growing public concern about their own corruption. In
Read More
Free Speech For People Calls on the Pennsylvania Attorney General to take Steps to Remove Leading Election Denialist Attorney from Representing Fulton County, Pennsylvania
Posted on
November 1, 2024
Election Protection
On October 31st, Free Speech For People sent a letter to the Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry calling on her to take all appropriate and necessary steps to urgently remove Stefanie Lambert from representing Fulton County, Pennsylvania as “special counsel” for all elections and election-related matters. Lambert is a key figure in the effort to
Read More
Free Speech For People and Mayer Brown Move to Intervene on behalf of the NAACP to Protect Nevada Voters from Last Minute Purge of Voter Rolls
Posted on
October 31, 2024
(November 1, 2024)
Election Protection
Today, the NAACP Tri-State Conference of Idaho-Nevada-Utah, represented by Free Speech For People, Mayer Brown LLP, and Woodburn and Wedge, moved to intervene in Dagusen v. Aguilar, a lawsuit brought by the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, Nevada Republican Party, and a voter demanding an unlawful purge of Nevada’s voter rolls just weeks before
Read More
Posted on
May 21, 2014
Share:
Post navigation
Your Logo Here
Citizens United, Part 2? Supreme Court Overturns MT Law Banning Corporate Elections Spending