Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed on behalf of the Pennsylvania NAACP cites major flaws in Pennsylvania’s current election plans that threaten voters’ ability to vote safely in November. 

HARRISBURG, PA (August 7, 2020) — Last night, Free Speech For People and the law firm Dechert LLP filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on behalf of the Pennsylvania State Conference of the NAACP alleging that the state’s insufficient number of polling places, use in many counties of repeat-touch voting machines, grossly inadequate options for early voting in person, and limited access to vote-by-mail will result in unsafe voting conditions and abridgment of the right to vote, with particular adverse impacts for voters of color, in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution’s guarantees of free and fair elections and equal protection of the law. The motion also presents new statistical evidence demonstrating the racially discriminatory impact of polling location closures which occurred in Pennsylvania during the June 2020 primary election.

“The right to vote is the cornerstone of our democracy,” says Kenneth L. Huston, President of the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference. “We will not allow the current unequal and unsafe voting conditions in Pennsylvania to stand. It is time for court intervention to ensure that our election this November will be safe, free, and fair and that the right to vote of all Pennsylvanians will be protected.”  

The motion follows a lawsuit that was filed in June challenging a broad range of Pennsylvania election practices as unsafe and unequal during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Public health experts, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania itself, project that the crisis will persist at least until the end of 2020, and that the second wave of COVID-19, which is expected to occur this fall, will be even more dire than the first wave.  African American and Latino citizens have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic, experiencing higher incidences of infection, hospitalization, and fatalities due to the coronavirus.  Thus, the risks of voting in an overcrowded polling place are particularly severe and disparate for these populations. 

“All eyes will be on Pennsylvania in November, and voters have the right to a free and fair election that doesn’t endanger their lives,” says Ron Fein, Legal Director of Free Speech For People. 

The complaint identifies several major flaws in Pennsylvania’s current election plans that threaten voters’ ability to vote safely in November:

• Impractical and overly rigid mail-in ballot procedures and deadlines that made it difficult for many voters to receive mail-in ballots sufficiently far in advance to cast their votes in the primary.
• Dramatic reductions (in some cases nearly 90%) in the number of polling places, often reducing polling places more in areas with substantial populations of African-American and Latino voters, and with inadequate notice. Crowding voters into fewer polling places can result in long lines and overcrowding, thus increasing the chance of virus transmission. 
• A single day for in-person voting at anywhere other than often hard-to-access county elections offices, forcing most in-person voters into the same spaces on one day, rather than making in-person voting available at accessible locations over several days or weeks, which would reduce overcrowding.
• Allowing counties to require all those voting in person to use hard-to-disinfect, repeat-touch electronic voting machines, rather than single-use paper ballots with disposable pens.  

Public health experts have identified repeat-touch electronic voting machines as a potential disease vector. While election officials might be able to mitigate this threat through frequent cleaning, doing so is impractical — cleaning the machines after each contact by a voter is time-consuming, difficult, and costly, and would lead to even longer lines at polling places. Such cleaning can also damage the machines and is ineffective in eliminating the coronavirus if improperly done. Meanwhile, using untested and uncertified alternatives such as gloves or Q-tips may not work properly with touchscreens, risking lost or miscast votes. For this reason, several Pennsylvania counties that were going to use electronic voting machines for the primary decided to use single-use hand-marked paper ballots (with disposable pens) instead.

Voting by mail can address many of these problems, but African-American and Latino voters are more likely to encounter difficulties in requesting or submitting mail ballots, and the Commonwealth’s deadlines and scheme for mail-in voting are inadequate and do not present a viable alternative for many voters.

“As our country tries to cope with an unprecedented pandemic and comes to grips with systemic racism, we are all reminded that there is nothing more fundamental to ensuring all of our rights than voting,” says Neil Steiner, a partner at Dechert.  “The November election will be a critical one for the future of our country and our state and it’s important that we get it right by ensuring that all people, including African Americans and Latinos, be afforded the right to participate equally and meaningfully.  No organization better exemplifies this commitment to equal justice than the NAACP, which is why Dechert is proud to partner with them and Free Speech For People to try to make that a reality.”

Free Speech For People and the law firm of Dechert LLP represent the plaintiffs pro bono. The defendants are the Secretary of the Commonwealth, Kathy Boockvar, and the Director of the Bureau of Election Services and Notaries, Jessica Mathis.

Click here to access the motion for preliminary injunction and the brief in support of the motion.