President Trump’s 2017 inauguration isn’t the only event with an anniversary coming on January 20. On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar, an important case on judicial fundraising and preserving public … More »
On Martin Luther King Jr. Day we celebrate the legacy of a human being dedicated to racial justice and equal rights for all. Dr. King envisioned a world without racism and bigotry, in which peace and tolerance rule. The current … More »
Free Speech For People launched in July 2017 a campaign calling for the divestment of public pension funds from Trump owned businesses which were funneling millions of dollars to the Trump Organization in violation of the Domestic Emoluments Clause of … More »
In a new oped published today in US News and World Report, Free Speech For People Legal Director Ron Fein discusses the lack of legal meaning, and enforceability, of the word ‘collusion’. “Collusion” is on America’s lips. Cable news personalities say … More »
Free Speech For People, with organizational partner RootsAction, launched a campaign for an impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump on January 20, 2017, based on violations of the Domestic and Foreign Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution. Since that time, we … More »
Come join the campaign to reclaim democracy for the people. Free Speech For People, a national nonpartisan nonprofit organization, was founded in 2010 after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision. We’re working to renew our democracy and reclaim … More »
Legal advocacy organization urges Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and New York Attorney General to investigate Trump Organization for potential criminal activity at the Trump Ocean Club Panama.
Today, Free Speech For People called on state and federal law enforcement to investigate whether the Trump Organization and its executives, including President Trump, have been involved in criminal activity at the Trump Ocean Club Panama.
Based on his demonstrated antipathy to common sense campaign finance laws and his complete lack of court experience, we oppose the nomination of Matthew Petersen to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.