On March 24, 2022, a group of Georgia voters filed a legal challenge to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s candidacy for re-election in 2022. The challenge, filed with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, alleges that Greene is constitutionally disqualified from public office under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, on the grounds that she helped facilitate the January 6, 2021 insurrection. The voters were represented by Free Speech For People, which served as co-lead counsel in the matter, along with New York-based Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Bryan Sells, an Atlanta-based civil rights lawyer specializing in voting rights and election law, served as local counsel. In response, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, filed a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, seeking to block that proceeding (Greene v. Raffensperger). She lost that attempt, and our legal team tried the first trial under section Three in 150 years before a Georgia judge. Ultimately, the judge found insufficient factual evidence that Greene, personally, had engaged in the insurrection, in part because she only took the oath of office on January 3, 2021 and was not subject to Section Three before then. But our challenge set important legal precedent that lays the groundwork for future challenges, including: that states have legal authority to adjudicate Section 3 challenges; that state processes for adjudicating Section 3 challenges do not violate a candidate’s constitutional rights; that no prior criminal conviction is required for Section 3 challenge; that words (including “marching orders or instructions to capture a particular objective, or to disrupt or obstruct a particular government proceeding”) can constitute engaging in insurrection; and that an 1872 congressional amnesty for ex-Confederates does not apply to January 6. I Key Facts II Background III Major Case Developments and Documents IV Press Highlights Key Facts Caption In re Challenge to the constitutional qualifications of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Court Secretary of State of Georgia Docket No. 2222582 Status Hearing scheduled April 22 Plaintiffs Georgia voters Defendants Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Caption Greene v. Raffensperger Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Docket No. 22-cv-01294-AT Status Motion to intervene filed Plaintiffs Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Defendants Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger Caption Marjorie Greene v. Secretary of State for the State of Georgia Court Docket No. 22-11299 Status Greene has appealed Judge Totenberg’s denial of the injunction to stop the state proceeding to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Plaintiffs Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Defendants Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger Background Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Disqualification Clause, provides: “No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress. . . who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” The purpose of the Disqualification Clause, passed in the wake of the Civil War, was to protect the country. Free Speech For People and Our Revolution are co-leading a national campaign to ensure that election officials across the country follow the mandate of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The coordinated and violent attack on the United States Capitol in an effort to prevent Congress from certifying the presidential vote on January 6, 2021 was an insurrection against the United States. The publicly available evidence establishes that Greene either helped to plan the attack on January 6, or alternatively helped to plan the pre-attack demonstration and/or march on the Capitol, with knowledge that it was substantially likely to lead to the attack, and otherwise voluntarily aided the insurrection. Some of this evidence was brought to the attention of the public in an October report by Rolling Stone. In the weeks leading up to January 6, Greene publicly stated that violence might be necessary to keep Trump in power, calling the date “our 1776 moment” (a codeword used by violent extremists to refer to an attack on government buildings). Since the insurrection, Representative Greene has attempted to defend the violence on January 6 as justified by the Declaration of Independence, calling convicted participants in the insurrections “political prisoners of war” and falsely claiming that the violence at the Capitol was perpetrated by “antifa” infiltrators or the FBI. On March 24, 2022, a group of Georgia voters filed a legal challenge to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s candidacy for re-election in 2022. Under Georgia’s candidacy challenge statute, once a challenge is filed, the Secretary of State must request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge of the Office of State Administrative Hearings to determine whether the candidate is qualified for office. The burden of proof then shifts to the candidate, who must “affirmatively establish [their] eligibility for office.” The challengers intend to issue subpoenas to Greene and take her deposition under oath—something that the U.S. House January 6 Select Committee has not yet done. The voters are represented by Free Speech For People, which is serving as co-lead counsel in the matter, along with New York-based Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Bryan Sells, an Atlanta-based civil rights lawyer specializing in voting rights and election law, is serving as local counsel. In response, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, filed a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, seeking to block that proceeding (Greene v. Raffensperger). Major Case Developments and Documents In re Challenge to the constitutional qualifications of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Complaint (March 24, 2022) Notice of Hearing (March 25, 2022) Motion To Take Party Deposition (March 28, 2022) Notice To Produce (March 28, 2022) Order Shortening Response Period (March 30, 2022) Prehearing Order (March 31, 2022) Motion to Stay Deposition (April 3, 2022) Objection to Notice to Produce (April 3, 2022) Motion to Dismiss (April 3, 2022) Order on Deposition (April 4, 2022) Subpoena to Marjorie Taylor Greene (April 5, 2022) Opposition to motion to dismiss (April 11, 2022) Motion to enforce subpoena to Marjorie Taylor Greene (April 11, 2022) Prehearing Order (April 13, 2022) Conference Before State Administrative Law Judge (video) (April 11, 2022) Petitioners’ Motion to Supplement the Record (April 26, 2022) Greene's Opposition to Petitioners' Motion to Supplement the Record (April 28, 2022) Post-hearing brief in support of petitioners' candidacy challenge to Greene (April 29, 2022) Respondent Marjorie Taylor Greene's Post-Hearing Brief (April 29, 2022) Administrative Law Judge's Initial Decision (May 6, 2022) Transcript of the proceeding before ALJ Charles Beaudrot Letter to Secretary Raffensperger (May 6, 2022) Secretary Raffensperger's Final Decision (May 6, 2022) Appeal of Secretary’s Decision (Rowan v. Raffensperger) Petition for Judicial Review (May 16, 2022) Greene’s Answer and Counterclaims to Petition for Judicial Review (June 13, 2022) Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date (June 15, 2022) Secretary’s Response to Petition for Judicial Review (June 24, 2022) Greene’s Response to Petition for Judicial Review (June 24, 2022) Secretary’s Response to Greene’s Counterclaims (July 11, 2022) Reply Brief for Appeal of Secretary's Decision (July 15, 2022) Transcript in Hearing for Appeal of Secretary's Decision (July 18, 2022) Fulton County Superior Court Order (July 25, 2022) Petitioners' Notice of Appeal (July 28, 2022) Appellants' Motion to Expedite (August 4, 2022) Greene's Motion to Renew Stay (August 15, 2022) GA Secretary of State Motion to Dismiss (August 17, 2022) Application for Discretionary Appeal (August 19, 2022) Intervenors' Response in Opposition to Motion to Renew Stay (August 23, 2022) Intervenor-Respondent's Response to Application for Discretionary Appeal (August 26, 2022) Secretary's Response to Application for Discretionary Appeal (August 29, 2022) Greene v. Raffensperger (District Court) Plaintiff's complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief (April 1, 2022) Plaintiff's emergency motion for temporary restraining order (April 1, 2022) Plaintiff's memo. of law in support of emergency motion for temporary restraining order (April 1, 2022) Plaintiff's memo. in support of motion for a preliminary injunction (April 1, 2022) Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (April 1, 2022) Rowan Intervenors' motion to intervene (April 4, 2022) Plaintiff's opposition to motion to intervene (April 6, 2022) State’s opposition to preliminary injunction (April 6, 2022) Intervenor Defendants' opposition to preliminary injunction (April 7, 2022) Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (April 7, 2022) Order (April 7, 2022) Order Denying Motion for Injunction (April 18, 2022) Plantiff's Motion to Stay (June 1, 2022) Intervenors' Response in Opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (June 2, 2022) Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Stay (June 3, 2022) Defendants Raffensperger and Beaudrot's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (June 3, 2022) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (August 17, 2022) Intervenors’ Response in Support of Motion to Dismiss (September 1, 2022) 4/22 – Marjorie Taylor Greene 14.3 Hearing (Full) Greene v. Raffensperger (11th Circuit) Brief of Appellant (April 27, 2022) Brief of Professor Derek T. Muller as amici curiae in support of no party (May 12, 2022) Intervenors Appellees' Brief (June 14, 2022) Brief of Constitutional Accountability Center as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees (June 14, 2022) Brief of State Appellees (June 14, 2022) Appellant's Reply Brief (June 21, 2022) Motion to Take Judicial Notice of State Appellees (July 28, 2022) Appellant's Motion to take Judicial Notice (August 2, 2022) Oral Arguments (August 11, 2022) Georgia Supreme Court Order Denying Discretionary Appeal (September 1, 2022) Opinion of the Court (November 3, 2022) Press Highlights Georgia voters appeal decision on Rep. Greene's eligibility The Washington Post, May 16, 2022 Attorney reacts to judge approving Marjorie Taylor Greene’s re-election bid MSNBC, May 6, 2022 Marjorie Taylor Greene’s 'Marshall Law' Text Could Boost Case To Keep Her Off Ballot HuffPost, April 27, 2022 Marjorie Taylor Greene Can’t Lie Her Way Out of the Fact That She Violated the 14th Amendment The Nation, April 26, 2022 Why Can’t These Republicans Remember What They Did on January 6th? The Daily Show, April 25, 2022 FSFP President John Bonifaz on MTG's Testimony CNN, April 22, 2022 Marjorie Taylor Greene Denies ‘Insurrectionist’ Charge in Court The New York Times, April 22, 2022 Greene says she can’t remember if she urged Trump to impose martial law The Washington Post, April 21, 2022 Will Marjorie Taylor Greene Be Banned From Congress? She's About To Go Under Oath For Jan. 6 MSNBC, April 19, 2022 Effort to Remove Marjorie Taylor Greene From Ballot Can Proceed, Judge Says The New York Times, April 18, 2022 Is Marjorie Taylor Greene Eligible for Re-Election? NowThis News, April 14, 2022 Judge hints Marjorie Taylor Greene re-election challenge can proceed MSNBC, April 11, 2022 Judge appears likely to allow January 6-related candidacy challenge against Marjorie Taylor Greene CNN, April 9, 2022 Marjorie Taylor Greene Unfit for Office, Suit Claims, Citing Jan. 6 Support Newsweek, March 24, 2022 Groups try to disqualify Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s candidacy over January 6 CNN, March 24, 2022 Voters challenge Greene’s eligibility to run for reelection Associated Press, March 24, 2022 Lawsuit: Georgia voters argue Greene should be "disqualified" from office Axios, March 24, 2022 Can Anyone Unseat Marjorie Taylor Greene? The New Yorker, March 24, 2022