On March 24, 2022, a group of Georgia voters filed a legal challenge to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s candidacy for re-election in 2022. The challenge, filed with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, alleges that Greene is constitutionally disqualified from public office under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, on the grounds that she helped facilitate the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

The voters were represented by Free Speech For People, which served as co-lead counsel in the matter, along with New York-based Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Bryan Sells, an Atlanta-based civil rights lawyer specializing in voting rights and election law, served as local counsel.

In response, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, filed a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, seeking to block that proceeding (Greene v. Raffensperger). She lost that attempt, and our legal team tried the first trial under section Three in 150 years before a Georgia judge. 

Ultimately, the judge found insufficient factual evidence that Greene, personally, had engaged in the insurrection, in part because she only took the oath of office on January 3, 2021 and was not subject to Section Three before then. But our challenge set important legal precedent that lays the groundwork for future challenges, including: that states have legal authority to adjudicate Section 3 challenges; that state processes for adjudicating Section 3 challenges do not violate a candidate’s constitutional rights; that no prior criminal conviction is required for Section 3 challenge; that words (including “marching orders or instructions to capture a particular objective, or to disrupt or obstruct a particular government proceeding”) can constitute engaging in insurrection; and that an 1872 congressional amnesty for ex-Confederates does not apply to January 6.

Key Facts

Caption In re Challenge to the constitutional qualifications of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
Court Secretary of State of Georgia
Docket No.

2222582

Status Hearing scheduled April 22
Plaintiffs Georgia voters
Defendants Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
Caption Greene v. Raffensperger
Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Docket No.

22-cv-01294-AT

Status Motion to intervene filed
Plaintiffs Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
Defendants Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger
Caption Marjorie Greene v. Secretary of State for the State of Georgia
Court
Docket No.

22-11299

Status Greene has appealed Judge Totenberg’s denial of the injunction to stop the state proceeding to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Plaintiffs Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
Defendants Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger

Background

Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Disqualification Clause, provides: “No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress. . . who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” The purpose of the Disqualification Clause, passed in the wake of the Civil War, was to protect the country. Free Speech For People and Our Revolution are co-leading a national campaign to ensure that election officials across the country follow the mandate of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The coordinated and violent attack on the United States Capitol in an effort to prevent Congress from certifying the presidential vote on January 6, 2021 was an insurrection against the United States. The publicly available evidence establishes that Greene either helped to plan the attack on January 6, or alternatively helped to plan the pre-attack demonstration and/or march on the Capitol, with knowledge that it was substantially likely to lead to the attack, and otherwise voluntarily aided the insurrection. Some of this evidence was brought to the attention of the public in an October report by Rolling Stone. In the weeks leading up to January 6, Greene publicly stated that violence might be necessary to keep Trump in power, calling the date “our 1776 moment” (a codeword used by violent extremists to refer to an attack on government buildings). Since the insurrection, Representative Greene has attempted to defend the violence on January 6 as justified by the Declaration of Independence, calling convicted participants in the insurrections “political prisoners of war” and falsely claiming that the violence at the Capitol was perpetrated by “antifa” infiltrators or the FBI.

On March 24, 2022, a group of Georgia voters filed a legal challenge to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s candidacy for re-election in 2022. Under Georgia’s candidacy challenge statute, once a challenge is filed, the Secretary of State must request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge of the Office of State Administrative Hearings to determine whether the candidate is qualified for office. The burden of proof then shifts to the candidate, who must “affirmatively establish [their] eligibility for office.” The challengers intend to issue subpoenas to Greene and take her deposition under oath—something that the U.S. House January 6 Select Committee has not yet done.

The voters are represented by Free Speech For People, which is serving as co-lead counsel in the matter, along with New York-based Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Bryan Sells, an Atlanta-based civil rights lawyer specializing in voting rights and election law, is serving as local counsel.

In response, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, filed a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, seeking to block that proceeding (Greene v. Raffensperger).

Major Case Developments and Documents

Press Highlights