Free Speech For People Applauds New Mexico Ruling Implementing Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause and Congratulates CREW

Latest Developments

Victory: Nevada Court Grants Intervention To NAACP in Voter Roll Purge Case

Posted on December 19, 2024 (December 19, 2024)

On December 17, 2024, a Nevada state court ruled that the NAACP Tri-State Conference of Idaho-Nevada-Utah has “significant, protectable interests” in the outcome of a lawsuit to unlawfully purge Nevada’s voter rolls, and has granted its motion to intervene as a defendant in the case. The lawsuit was filed by the Trump campaign and Republican
Read More

U.S. Senator Gillibrand Responds to National Archivist’s Refusal to Certify The Equal Rights Amendment

Posted on December 18, 2024 (December 18, 2024)

Democracy Amendments

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand issued the following statement in response to the National Archivist’s refusal to certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment. “The archivist is correct that she has a responsibility to uphold the law. Unfortunately, by refusing to certify the ERA, she is wrongfully inserting herself into a clear
Read More

Remote Summer 2025 Legal Internships at Free Speech For People

Posted on December 17, 2024

FSFP Updates

Come join the campaign to reclaim democracy for the people by fighting for free and fair elections and against abuse of power! Free Speech For People is a national nonpartisan nonprofit organization, founded in January 2010 after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision. Since then, we have worked to renew our democracy and
Read More

Free Speech For People applauds the New Mexico judge’s decision in White v. Griffin, finding that the (now-former) county commissioner Couy Griffin is disqualified from public office under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (the Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause), and congratulates Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) for leading this case.

The judge’s decision sets precedent that goes far beyond New Mexico. Building on (and repeatedly citing) legal points established in Free Speech For People’s similar challenge to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Griffin decision reaffirms several important legal principles that will apply to any other insurrectionists who seek or hold public office–including, if he chooses to run again, Donald Trump. These principles include:

The January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, and surrounding events, constituted an “insurrection.”
The legal test for whether someone has “engaged” in insurrection remains the Worthy-Powell standard: whether they voluntarily aided the insurrection by personal service or contributed anything that was useful to it. As the New Mexico judge explained, this also includes anyone “leagued” with insurrectionists: “either by acting in concert with others knowing that the group intended to achieve its purpose in part by violence,” or “by performing an ‘overt act’ knowing that act would ‘aid or support’ the insurrection.”
This can include speech, and the First Amendment does not protect an insurrectionist from disqualification. As the New Mexico judge noted, “Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is just as much a part of the Constitution as the First Amendment.”
No prior criminal conviction is necessary for disqualification.

Free Speech For People has committed to filing multiple Section 3 legal challenges to the candidacies of other insurrectionists (including, if he runs again, Donald Trump), and CREW’s victory in New Mexico helps reaffirm longstanding legal principles that will underlie those challenges.