Must Read: Ballot petition on app-based deliveries masks proponents’ true intent

Latest Developments

Victory: Nevada Court Grants Intervention To NAACP in Voter Roll Purge Case

Posted on December 19, 2024 (December 19, 2024)

On December 17, 2024, a Nevada state court ruled that the NAACP Tri-State Conference of Idaho-Nevada-Utah has “significant, protectable interests” in the outcome of a lawsuit to unlawfully purge Nevada’s voter rolls, and has granted its motion to intervene as a defendant in the case. The lawsuit was filed by the Trump campaign and Republican
Read More

U.S. Senator Gillibrand Responds to National Archivist’s Refusal to Certify The Equal Rights Amendment

Posted on December 18, 2024 (December 18, 2024)

Democracy Amendments

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand issued the following statement in response to the National Archivist’s refusal to certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment. “The archivist is correct that she has a responsibility to uphold the law. Unfortunately, by refusing to certify the ERA, she is wrongfully inserting herself into a clear
Read More

Remote Summer 2025 Legal Internships at Free Speech For People

Posted on December 17, 2024

FSFP Updates

Come join the campaign to reclaim democracy for the people by fighting for free and fair elections and against abuse of power! Free Speech For People is a national nonpartisan nonprofit organization, founded in January 2010 after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision. Since then, we have worked to renew our democracy and
Read More

Free Speech For People’s Legal Director Courtney Hostetler and Counsel Amira Mattar published an opinion essay in Mass Live this week arguing that foreign-influenced corporations should not be allowed to proceed with a deceptive ballot petition campaign to exempt app-based drivers in MA from state protections.

They write:

The ballot petition process ensures that the people have lawmaking power. They may create laws without interference of hesitant, deadlocked, and compromised legislatures. But the people’s voice cannot be heard if wealthy special interests – including corporations reliant on the backing of powerful foreign entities – wield their unmatched financial resources to push through petitions designed to deceive voters. Such maneuvering is unconstitutional.

Read the full essay here.

The essay was adapted from an amicus brief Free Speech For People filed in El Koussa v. Campbell in support of voters who have asked the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to block placement of five petitions on the November 2024 ballot that would exclude app-based drivers in Massachusetts from state benefits and protections. The petitions were introduced by representatives of delivery and transportation companies, like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart. For the second time in three years, these companies introduced confusing, misleading ballot petitions that would strip their workers of valuable protections, and they are willing to spend big to garner public support to push these petitions onto the ballot and into law.

In September 2023, representatives of delivery and transportation companies gathered signatures on five certified petitions that exempt app-based drivers from being designated “employees” under Massachusetts law. All five petitions would exempt companies from responsibilities and obligations otherwise required of employers under various chapters of Massachusetts law, costing their workers the protection of labor and social safety net laws. Three of those petitions offer in return only subpar benefits that most drivers will not qualify for. Two of them would provide their drivers with no benefits at all.