Challenges to Trump’s Eligibility Under Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause featured on ABC’s “This Week” Posted on November 6, 2023 (November 7, 2023) Challenging Corruption The movement to hold former President Donald Trump accountable under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment for his role in the January 6th insurrection is gaining momentum. With state courts in Minnesota, Michigan, and Colorado currently hearing cases against Trump citing the Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause, at least one or more of these cases could beRead More
Ron Fein & Laurence Tribe In The Boston Globe: House Should Expand the Scope of Its Impeachment Inquiry To Include Trump’s Abuse Of the Pardon Power Posted on October 23, 2019 (June 12, 2020) Impeachment In a recent Boston Globe piece FSFP Legal Director Ron Fein and Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe make a strong case for broadening the scope of the ongoing impeachment inquiry to include Donald Trump’s abuse of the pardon power. Citing Trump’s unlawful pardon of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in 2017, they argue thatRead More
Washington Post: Can Super PACs Be Put Back in the Box? Posted on July 7, 2016 (July 7, 2016) Matea Gold of the Washington Post outlines the latest legal advocacy efforts from FSFP, which includes the filing of a FEC complaint targeting super PAC spending.Read More
Stream Audio From The FEC Forum On Corporate Political Spending & Political Influence Posted on June 28, 2016 (June 28, 2016) FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub hosted a forum on “Corporate Political Spending and Foreign Influence.”Read More
Laurence Tribe & Scott Greytak: “Get foreign political money out of US Elections” Posted on June 22, 2016 (June 22, 2016) Our Scott Greytak and Harvard Law Professor, Laurence Tribe, co-authored an op-ed posted to The Boston Globe on how foreign political money and U.S. political spending.Read More
Who Blew The Lid Off Campaign Contributions Posted on December 18, 2015 (October 2, 2018) Citizens United may have set the stage for Super PACs, but it is the SpeechNow ruling and the Justice Department’s inaction that bear the greater responsibility. Read More