Voting Rights Advocates Filed Lawsuit in June on Behalf of the Pennsylvania NAACP – Pennsylvania NAACP Will Oppose the Intervention Motion

HARRISBURG, PA (July 21, 2020) — President Trump’s re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee (RNC) filed a motion yesterday to intervene in a case challenging a broad range of Pennsylvania election practices as unsafe and unequal during the COVID-19 pandemic. On June 18, Free Speech For People and the law firm Dechert LLP filed the lawsuit in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on behalf of the Pennsylvania State Conference of the NAACP. The Complaint alleges that the state’s insufficient number of polling places, use in many counties of repeat-touch voting machines, requirement that voting in person must take place within a single day, and limited access to vote-by-mail will result in unsafe voting conditions and abridgment of the right to vote, with particular adverse impacts for voters of color, in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution’s guarantees of free and fair elections and equal protection of the law.

The Trump Campaign and the Republican National Committee, along with the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Republican Party of Pennsylvania seek to oppose the Pennsylvania NAACP in this case and to block the remedies requested to help ensure a safe and secure election in Pennsylvania this November. 

Public health experts, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania itself, project that the pandemic will persist at least until the end of 2020, and that the second wave of COVID-19, which is expected to occur this fall, will be even more dire than the first wave.  African American and Latino citizens have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic, experiencing higher incidences of infection, hospitalization, and fatalities due to the coronavirus.  Thus, the risks of voting in an overcrowded polling place are particularly severe and disparate for these populations. 

“The right to vote is the cornerstone of our democracy,” says Kenneth L. Huston, President of the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference. “We will not allow the current unequal and unsafe voting conditions in Pennsylvania to stand. It is time for court intervention to ensure that our election this November will be safe, free, and fair and that the right to vote of all Pennsylvanians will be protected.”  

The COVID-19 disease can be spread person-to-person or through contact with an infected surface such as a repeat-touch electronic voting machine. The best practices for reducing the risk include social distancing as much as possible and reducing repeated touching of the same surfaces. Forcing voters to vote on a single day in a reduced number of polling places risks overcrowding, which impedes the right to vote in normal times and poses a serious risk of illness or death during the pandemic. 

“All eyes will be on Pennsylvania in November, and voters have the right to a free and fair election that doesn’t endanger their lives,” said Ron Fein, Legal Director of Free Speech For People. 

The PA NAACP complaint identifies several major flaws in Pennsylvania’s current election plans that threaten voters’ ability to vote safely in November:

  • Impractical and overly rigid mail-in ballot procedures and deadlines that made it difficult for many voters to receive mail-in ballots sufficiently far in advance to cast their votes in the primary.
  • Dramatic reductions (in some cases nearly 90%) in the number of polling places, often reducing polling places more in areas with substantial populations of African-American and Latino voters, and with inadequate notice. Crowding voters into fewer polling places can result in long lines and overcrowding, thus increasing the chance of virus transmission. 
  • A single day for in-person voting, forcing all in-person voters into the same spaces on one day, rather than spreading in-person voting over several days or weeks, which would reduce overcrowding.
  • Allowing counties to require all those voting in person to use hard-to-disinfect, repeat-touch electronic voting machines, rather than single-use paper ballots with disposable pens.  

Public health experts have identified repeat-touch electronic voting machines as a potential disease vector. While election officials might be able to mitigate this threat through frequent cleaning, doing so is impractical — cleaning the machines after each contact by a voter is time-consuming, difficult, and costly, and would lead to even longer lines at polling places. Such cleaning can also damage the machines and is ineffective in eliminating the coronavirus if improperly done. Meanwhile, using untested and uncertified alternatives such as gloves or Q-tips may not work properly with touchscreens, risking lost or miscast votes. For this reason, several Pennsylvania counties that were going to use electronic voting machines for the primary decided to use single-use hand-marked paper ballots (with disposable pens) instead.

Voting by mail can address many of these problems, but African-American and Latino voters are more likely to encounter difficulties in requesting or submitting mail ballots, and the Commonwealth’s deadlines and scheme for mail-in voting are inadequate and do not present a viable alternative for many voters.

The suit seeks injunctive relief, including requiring a minimum number of polling places per population, expansion of voting days, increased access to vote by mail, and use of hand-marked paper ballots for the general election.

Free Speech For People and the law firm of Dechert LLP represent the plaintiffs pro bono. The defendants are the Secretary of the Commonwealth, Kathy Boockvar, and the Director of the Bureau of Election Services and Notaries, Jessica Mathis.


Free Speech For People works to renew our democracy and our United States Constitution for we the people. Founded on the day of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling in January 2010, Free Speech For People envisions a democratic process in which all people have an equal voice and an equal vote. We fight for free and fair elections, for reliable and secure voting systems, and for the bedrock principle that, in a democracy, all voters must have their votes properly counted. To learn more, please visit

Dechert is a leading global law firm with 26 offices around the world. We advise on matters and transactions of the greatest complexity, bringing energy, creativity and efficient management of legal issues to deliver commercial and practical advice for clients.

Read more about Pennsylvania State Conference of the NAACP v. Boockvar.