The Biggest Threat to Citizens United Posted on January 6, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments David Sirota Salon.com January 6, 2012 The Montana AG explains why his state’s challenge to the controversial decision could hold up in the Supreme Court. Read More
Anti-environmental group vows to fight for ‘God-given rights’ in wake of Montana ruling Posted on January 6, 2012 (August 21, 2020) Democracy Amendments Decision seen as direct challenge to U.S. Supreme Court on corporate spending By David O. Williams Colorado Independent Friday, January 06, 2012 Read More
Corporations are people too? Not in Montana! At least for now. Posted on January 6, 2012 (August 21, 2020) Democracy Amendments Michael Bobelian Forbes January 5, 2012 The fallout from the Supreme Court’s 2010 seminal opinion – Citizens United v. FEC – voiding restrictions on election-related speech by corporations (along with labor unions and non-profits) continues to reverberate as we inch along the presidential campaign. Many political observers are wondering how corporate money will influence the election? Read More
SCOTUS expected to weigh Montana campaign finance appeal Posted on January 6, 2012 (August 21, 2020) Democracy Amendments Politico Robin Bravender January 5, 2012 The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to wade into the hot-button debate over corporate cash in politics again, just in time for the 2012 election season. Read More
Ask the Presidential Candidates Whether They Support Corporate Spending in Our Elections Posted on January 6, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments This coming Saturday and Sunday, the Republican presidential candidates will face off in two nationally-televised debates on the eve of the New Hampshire primary. In each debate, people from across the country have the opportunity to submit questions to be asked of the candidates. We should seize this opportunity to ensure that the question of corporate personhood and corporate spending in our elections becomes part of the presidential debate. Read More
Supreme Court likely to decide on Montana’s corporate campaign spending ban Posted on January 5, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments By Charles S. Johnson Missoulian State Bureau January 4, 2012 HELENA – Some national legal experts believe the U.S. Supreme Court almost surely will have the final word on the recent Montana Supreme Court decision that reinstated the state’s century-old ban on corporate spending for or against state political candidates. Read More
John Bonifaz discusses the recent NYC resolution on the Dylan Ratigan Show Posted on January 5, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments Inspired by the resolution passed in Los Angeles last month, the New York City Council has passed its own, declaring corporations are not people. John Bonifaz of Free Speech For People joins the Dylan Ratigan Show to discuss. Read More
Super PAC’s Ability to Ruin Gingrich Shows the Impact of Citizens United Ruling on US Elections Posted on January 5, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Challenging Super PACs New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Other Early Primary States Prone to Super PAC Activity Big Money Spending in Iowa Caucus Leads to Meteoric Fall of a Candidate Read More
Montana Supreme Court upholds election spending limits Posted on January 5, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments The high court upholds the state’s century-old corporate contribution limits, a rebuff of the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed businesses to spend as freely as individuals in campaigns. By Kim Murphy, Los Angeles TimesJanuary 4, 2012 Read More
More on the Montana Rebellion: Unanimous contempt for Citizens United Posted on January 4, 2012 (August 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments By Jeff Clements December 31, 2011 Read More