Senate Obstruction Takes Down Bill To Promote Campaign Transparency Posted on July 30, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Defending Key Reforms A few days ago, Senate Republicans united to defeat the Disclose Act, critical legislation intended to respond to the Supreme Court’s invalidation in Citizens United v. FEC of the ban on the use of corporate general treasury funds to make independent political expenditures. The House passed the Act in June. But despite the wishes ofRead More
Senator Max Baucus Proposes Constitutional Amendment to Allow Regulation of Campaign Funding Posted on July 28, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Democracy Amendments By David Swanson The DISCLOSE Act, a bill passed by the House that would regulate corporate election spending was blocked in the Senate on Thursday by a filibuster — momentum is building to eliminate that anti-democratic tool. And momentum is building, as well, for reforms of our campaign finance system that go beyond what theRead More
The Next Senator from Target Corporation Posted on July 27, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Corporate Abuse of Power Here’s a type of story that may become so common it’s no longer a story, or those pushing back and working for structural reform may prevail: Target Corp. spending company money on candidates By MARTIGA LOHN (AP) – ST. PAUL, Minn. — Here’s something Target Corp. isn’t advertising in its Sunday circular: The discount retailerRead More
Video: Interview of Congresswoman Donna Edwards Posted on July 26, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Democracy Amendments Photo by spatuletail / Shutterstock.comRead More
Undoing Citizens United: A Comprehensive Plan to Prevent Corporations from Buying Elections Posted on July 24, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Democracy Amendments Photo by spatuletail / Shutterstock.comRead More
New Groups Aim to Spend Big on Election Ads Posted on July 23, 2010 (June 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments By SHARON THEIMER, Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — Two new groups – one Republican-leaning, the other pro-Democratic – seeking to capitalize on a Supreme Court ruling allowing the use of unlimited donations for ads targeting candidates have gotten the go-ahead from election officials. The Federal Election Commission on Thursday approved plans by the conservative Club for Growth and by Democratic activists to collect big contributions for ads on candidates. Both say the committees set up to run the ads will disclose their donors and spending to the FEC in publicly available reports. Read More
Corporate Control of Our Democracy: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Posted on July 13, 2010 (June 30, 2020) Corporate Abuse of Power By Radhika Balakrishnan and James Heintz, Huffington Post This January the U.S. Supreme Court issued a shattering ruling that will intensify corporate influence in our democracy to an unprecedented degree. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Court ruled that government restrictions on corporate election spending are unconstitutional because such restrictions violated corporations’ right to free speech as set out in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights. In effect, the Court was evoking a core civil right to advance corporate power. This is a dangerous precedent, one that will undermine the obligation of the government to respect and protect human rights by giving corporations full reign to advance their own interests in the democratic – yet increasingly plutocratic – United States. The idea that corporations have the same rights as you and me comes from a Supreme Court decision over 120 years ago – Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) – the focus of which was whether railroads could deduct their debts from the value of their property for tax purposes. The Supreme Court laid down a much broader ruling, effectively stating that corporations should enjoy the same equal protections under the law as individuals. Equal protection under the law was spelled out in the 14th Amendment which was adopted following the Civil War. The original motivation for the amendment had little to do with advancing corporate influence. It overturned the Dred Scott decision (in which slaves were denied citizenship) and laid the groundwork for ending segregation in the U.S. and subsequent civil rights laws. READ THE REST AT Huffington Post Read More
How Often Does Each SCOTUS Justice Side With the US Chamber of Commerce? Posted on June 28, 2010 (August 18, 2020) Democracy Amendments This graphic comes from a good report: PDF.Read More
Three questions with Jeffrey Clements Posted on June 26, 2010 (June 24, 2020) Democracy Amendments By Patrick Ball/Staff Writer, GateHouse News Service Concord — The Massachusetts Corporate Political Accountability Act is strong start but doesn’t fix the problem created by the Citizens United decision, according to Concord lawyer Jeffrey Clements. Read More
Citizens United panel at America’s Future Now! Conference Posted on June 22, 2010 (June 30, 2020) Democracy Amendments Read More